I'm of a similar mindset. I nearly always wear some kind of genital accouterment, but mine are extremely tame compared to what's available.
The majority of events I attend are all-male so erections are something to tease lightly about. We all know they have a mind of their own. A common response is something like, "Oh, is that for me? I'm very flattered but this isn't the time or place for that."
I've rarely seen another person make a big deal about it. When I have I'd say about half the time I get the vibe the person isn't genuinely offended, but looking for something to be offended by.
I think we are pretty much on the same wavelength. Erections are a complete nonissue for me. I can count the number of times I was at a naturist venue and had an unwelcome erection (beyond a one) on the fingers of one hand. That's over the last 50 years, even including one as an 18 year old posing for an art class for the first time. (It was seriously embarrassing but I didn't get fired and it didn't happen again.) That would have been 1974.
I don't think an unconcealed erection is immoral, just poor etiquette and impolite. The fundamental issue is that you'd have to read the man's mind to know the reason for the erection. In the absence of psychic powers, bad intent will be assumed, and there's nothing you can do about that in a group of strangers and casual acquaintances.
I don't believe in arguing that nudists "shouldn't" be bothered by an obvious erection. The fact is that many are and you are not going to convince them otherwise. I don't argue with facts. Even if for nothing but business reasons. You can't remove those people from resorts and the owner doesn't want to lose their money.
OTOH, a small informal group of friends might not have a problem with it, since you know each other and understand it is not coming from a place of sexual aggression.
I'm of a similar mindset. I nearly always wear some kind of genital accouterment, but mine are extremely tame compared to what's available.
The majority of events I attend are all-male so erections are something to tease lightly about. We all know they have a mind of their own. A common response is something like, "Oh, is that for me? I'm very flattered but this isn't the time or place for that."
I've rarely seen another person make a big deal about it. When I have I'd say about half the time I get the vibe the person isn't genuinely offended, but looking for something to be offended by.
I think we are pretty much on the same wavelength. Erections are a complete nonissue for me. I can count the number of times I was at a naturist venue and had an unwelcome erection (beyond a one) on the fingers of one hand. That's over the last 50 years, even including one as an 18 year old posing for an art class for the first time. (It was seriously embarrassing but I didn't get fired and it didn't happen again.) That would have been 1974.
I don't think an unconcealed erection is immoral, just poor etiquette and impolite. The fundamental issue is that you'd have to read the man's mind to know the reason for the erection. In the absence of psychic powers, bad intent will be assumed, and there's nothing you can do about that in a group of strangers and casual acquaintances.
I don't believe in arguing that nudists "shouldn't" be bothered by an obvious erection. The fact is that many are and you are not going to convince them otherwise. I don't argue with facts. Even if for nothing but business reasons. You can't remove those people from resorts and the owner doesn't want to lose their money.
OTOH, a small informal group of friends might not have a problem with it, since you know each other and understand it is not coming from a place of sexual aggression.